Proof that females are physically incompetent

You've just found the penis-shaped door to freedom. GET ON YOUR FUCKING FEET. Turn the tables on your masters. Light the entire world on fire. The time for sitting there like a little bitch is OVER.
Forum rules
This section is open to the public. Feel free to post questions, criticisms or comments. Thank you.
Post Reply
User avatar
skionsir
Jedi Bonersaber
Posts: 461
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:37 pm
Location: In a van down by the river
Contact:

Re: Proof that females are physically incompetent

Post by skionsir » Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:31 pm

The stupid cunt falling down and rolling on her back like a turtle was the best part. It made me :D3
"Think of this training as a fun adventure instead of as a chore. Quit dreaming about how much better your life would be once you became socially competent and start training right now." - MrCareBear

Info
Dean of Beatdowns
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:34 am
Contact:

Re: Proof that females are physically incompetent

Post by Info » Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:26 am

Female Troops Medevaced from Afghanistan at Higher Rate Than Male Comrades
July 09, 2013

Image

As the U.S. military prepares to send women into the toughest combat billets for the first time, Pentagon medical officers have just released data showing that while “battle injuries” were the leading reason male troops were flown outside Afghanistan for medical care, “mental disorders” topped the list for female troops. :D3 :D3 :D3

That shouldn’t come as a complete surprise. After all, women remain technically barred from the infantry and other units where close-in combat is the norm. But the data also show that despite the ban, women were medically evacuated from Afghanistan at a rate 22% higher than their male comrades.

Says Barry McCaffrey, a retired four-star Army general, there are key differences. “In general, women soldiers in good physical condition have much less upper body strength than male soldiers—and are more prone to impact injuries and stress fractures,” he says. “Women soldiers are challenged by some field combat duties such as carrying five-gallon cans of fuel and water, changing armor vehicle track and heavy truck tires, carrying 100-plus-pound loads of ammunition and fighting gear on extended dismounted operations, carrying stretchers of wounded soldiers, and the brute labor required to dig in fighting positions.” (so basically the ACTUAL requirements, without the "personal growth" and "inner courage" and all that other bullshit.)

“Women are, on average, less well-suited to the lifestyle of infantry and direct infantry support units,” says William Treseder, who deployed to both Afghanistan and Iraq as a Marine sergeant. At least one female Marine agrees. No woman has been able to pass recent physical-qualification tests for Marine officers.

Medical teams inside Afghanistan handle most wounds, injuries and ailments. “Medical air transports (`medical evacuations’) are costly and generally indicative of serious medical conditions” that cannot be handled in the war zone, the report adds. “Some serious conditions (e.g., battle wounds) are directly related to participation in or support of combat operations; however, many others are unrelated to combat and may be preventable.”

In politically incorrect terms: WHY THE FUCK ARE SELFISH WOMEN WASTING OUR MONEY AND RESOURCES WHERE THEY DON'T BELONG?

:?:

The study, contained in the June issue of the Pentagon’s Medical Surveillance Monthly Report, tracked the 23,719 medical evacuations from the theater among the 1.7 million U.S. deployments between Oct. 7, 2001, the day the U.S. invaded Afghanistan in response to the 9/11 terror attacks, and Dec. 31, 2012.
social interaction is an interruption.

shape or be shaped.

Info
Dean of Beatdowns
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:34 am
Contact:

Re: Proof that females are physically incompetent

Post by Info » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:09 pm

is this who's going to be protecting me?



is this to test a police officer's ability to cry like a little girl? :think:
social interaction is an interruption.

shape or be shaped.

User avatar
Boris The Chick
Old enough to buy first Playboy
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:14 am

Re: Proof that females are physically incompetent

Post by Boris The Chick » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:36 pm

More fuck ups on the military

The US Navy starts classes for babysitting strong and independent women :girlclap:
7-9-2013

Image
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES, Ill. — On Day 3 of Navy boot camp here, recruits sat through a two-hour session on sexual harassment and sexual assault — including a warning that alcohol often plays a significant role, but is never a defense.
really? 2 hours of this shit? :?:
Also, is never a defense if you're a MAN, if you're a woman, it absolves you from all accountability, as you will see next
“Do you think ‘Ms. Sloppy Drunk’ can give consent for sexual intercourse?” Petty Officer First Class Vince Turner, just back from an 11-month deployment in the Mediterranean, asked 100 recruits in a recent class.

He answered his own question: “Of course not. If this happens, it’s like an insider attack.”
I got a better question
"Do you think that Ms sloppy is qualified to use panties or she should keep using training diapers?"
:yay:
On the bus ride from O’Hare International Airport to start basic training, they watched a videotape of Capt. John T. Dye, who commands the Navy’s only boot camp, speaking directly about sexual assault as a crime. The video message was repeated the next day as recruits waited for medical screening and their first Navy haircuts.
Fucking awesome! you get a two hour class of this shit, and then you get to see it in the infirmary, at the barbershop, during lunch, when you go to the bathroom, while you sleep :angry-screaming:
Instead of teaching you something useful that you can actually use in combat or show you the basics to keep them sharp, you get burned into your skull on how to babysit useless bitches
Alcohol fuels assault, so young sailors are taught the warning signs for when a
shipmate
woman is drinking too much, and how to judge whether another sailor’s advances might be all about taking advantage. Hours of training focus on how
to intervene gently but firmly to separate someone from a possible predator.
babysitt a child
“It is our job to inculcate them into our culture, which is one that does not tolerate sexual assault,” Captain Dye said.
Bystander intervention isn’t some grandiose thing, a knight in shining armor to keep someone from being raped,” said Petty Officer Corryn Fraser, a member of the base’s new peer-to-peer mentoring program. “It’s more: ‘Hey, you shouldn’t talk to her that way. That’s inappropriate.’ Or, ‘Don’t you think you’ve had enough to drink?’ ”
"How dare you to make a dongle joke? :naughty: "
Some of the assault-prevention initiatives are conducted by specially trained Navy personnel, and some by [strike]academic experts[/strike] feminist or social workers who charge only for travel expenses. Other advanced sessions — one is called “Sex Signals” and another “Afterburner” — are taught on contract and cost the Navy about $500,000 a year. The sessions include a video depicting a fictionalized rape, supplemented by lengthy discussion, which can get explicit.
Sure, that could had been used for the salaries of future, useful, male recruits , but i guess babysitting women comes first when you're in combat :text-bravo:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/09/us/fo ... =all&_r=2&

Info
Dean of Beatdowns
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:34 am
Contact:

Re: Proof that females are physically incompetent

Post by Info » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:31 pm

FBI Analyst Sues FBI For Gender Discrimination, Saying Fitness Test Biased Against Men
April 12, 2012

A male employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is suing the agency for gender discrimination, claiming that a physical fitness test to become an FBI agent is biased against men.

Jay Bauer, a Ph.D. graduate of Northwestern University from Mount Prospect, Ill., said he missed the fitness test by one-push up, completing only 29 push-ups instead of the minimum 30 required for male trainees, which disqualified him from becoming a special agent. The test, administered at the FBI academy in Quantico, Va., has different physical minimum requirements for female and male trainees.

Bauer argues in the complaint that the FBI violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He also alleges a trainee who failed to pass the female standards of the physical test was given a second chance.

The suit states "desiring to use his skills and experience for the public good, [Bauer] left an academic position at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee to join the FBI as a Special Agent." During New Agent Training at Quantico, which he joined around March 2009, he relocated his wife and two children, ages 3 and 5 at the time, to Cook County, Ill., after receiving his first office assignment to the FBI's Chicago Division. He is currently an intelligence analyst there.

Bauer said female new agent trainees became special agents despite completing fewer than half the number of push-ups and scoring fewer overall points than he did on even the female version of the physical fitness test (PFT).

One particular female trainee was "at or near the bottom of the class in performance" in firearms training, "struggled" in academics training, and appeared "to lack the dedication and mental-toughness" for the special agent position. The suit states Bauer was at or near the top of the class in performance in all other areas "and, in fact, was voted by his peers during the [New Agent Training Program] as the class leader, designating him to speak on their behalf at graduation."

Bauer claims the FBI "arbitrarily" selected a different minimum standard based on sex "that does not measure in any way the minimum physical ability required to do the job of a Special Agent."

To pass the PFT, male trainees must complete a minimum of 38 sit-ups and females a minimum of 35 to score one point in the sit-up event. Males must complete a minimum of 30 push-ups, females a minimum of 14, to score one point in the push-up event. Times required for 300 meter-sprints and 1.5 milers also vary.

Bauer alleges the FBI ignored data suggesting the different physical standards are not equally difficult, pointing to the Cooper Institute's "large database of fitness norms." Despite the fact that 14 push-ups for females correspond to between 27 and 29 push-ups for males, Bauer said the FBI "failed to adjust the arbitrarily selected standard of 14 for females and 30 for males."

Brad Garrett, ABC News consultant and former FBI agent, said the reason for different minimum scores for men and women is that "Women do not have the upper body strength that men do." A different number of pull-ups have been in place for a number of years.
social interaction is an interruption.

shape or be shaped.

Info
Dean of Beatdowns
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:34 am
Contact:

Re: Proof that females are physically incompetent

Post by Info » Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:50 am

Just heard a brilliantly simple argument:
if women are just as strong as men, why do they fear getting raped? wouldn't they just be able to fend off any male attacker with equal strength?
we already know the answer. :D3
social interaction is an interruption.

shape or be shaped.

Info
Dean of Beatdowns
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:34 am
Contact:

Re: Proof that females are physically incompetent

Post by Info » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:26 am


female soldier boxes :D3
social interaction is an interruption.

shape or be shaped.

Info
Dean of Beatdowns
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:34 am
Contact:

Re: Proof that females are physically incompetent

Post by Info » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:35 am

Meet the seemingly unfireable female firefighter
November 10, 2013

She’s the Teflon probie. Despite failing a required FDNY running test five times, Wendy Tapia was allowed to graduate from the Fire Academy and become a firefighter. On Dec. 2, she is taking the test for an unprecedented sixth time.

But Tapia, 31, has yet to work a shift at her firehouse, ­Engine No. 316 in East Elmhurst, Queens, where she was assigned May 18. At the end of 18 weeks of probationary training, Tapia failed to run 1¹/₂ miles in 12 minutes without gear, as required by the academy. She blamed a foot injury. The FDNY let her graduate anyway — and gave her five more deadlines over the past six months to pass the running test.

She failed all five times.

Normally, probationary firefighters who fail the running test at the end of academy training don’t graduate — period. They flunk out but can join the next academy class, start over and get another chance to pass the course. Tapia’s treatment has inflamed male and female colleagues alike. “I don’t know how she got to graduate. It never should have happened,” a firefighter told The Post. “You should not graduate if you can’t meet all the requirements...”

After graduation, instead of joining fellow firefighters in the field, Tapia went on medical leave from May 20 to June 10 to recover from her foot injury. She then went on light duty until July 2, reporting to FDNY headquarters in Downtown Brooklyn. She “reports to work . . . wearing our uniform? F- -KING JOKE!” one firefighter fumed on an online rant site. Tapia returned to full duty — but was sent back to Randall’s ­Island for extra help. “They put so many resources into training just her,” an insider said. “Every time she fails, she has a different excuse.” Tapia failed the running test once in August, once in September and three times in October, said sources familiar with her situation. In her last try, on Halloween, she clocked a 12:23, still too slow.

But FDNY Commissioner Salvatore Cassano gave Tapia another break after United Women Firefighters (UWF), a fraternal group of active and retired FDNY women, intervened to block her potential firing. They said she had an ­upper respiratory infection. But suffering a cold is no excuse, the firefighter said. “We have to do our job in all types of situations,” she said. “If I go to a fire, what am going to do — tell the guys I’m staying out by the ­engine because I’m not feeling so good? It’s 100 percent unheard of.” FDNY brass, under pressure from a court order to hire more minorities, “want their numbers — that’s all it is.”

Another insider said it also ­undermines confidence in the Fire Department. “If someone’s life is hanging on the line, you only get one try. There’s no ­do-overs when it’s for real,” the insider said.
Image
social interaction is an interruption.

shape or be shaped.

Info
Dean of Beatdowns
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:34 am
Contact:

Re: Proof that females are physically incompetent

Post by Info » Tue Nov 12, 2013 4:33 pm

this girl throws hand grenades like a girl:



chick soldier kicking down a door:



bonus: chick soldier shows off her crescent kick technique:

social interaction is an interruption.

shape or be shaped.

User avatar
Dick Van Dyke
Hall Monitor
Posts: 1614
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:59 pm

Re: Proof that females are physically incompetent

Post by Dick Van Dyke » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:17 pm

The Problems of Women in Combat – From a Female Combat Vet
Jude Eden


It’s not all about qualification. I’m speaking as a female Marine Iraq war vet who did serve in the combat zone doing entry checkpoint duty in Fallujah, and we worked with the grunts daily for that time. All the branches still have different standards for females and males. Why? Because most women wouldn’t even qualify to be in the military if they didn’t have separate standards. Men and women are different, but those pushing women into combat don’t want to admit that truth. They huff and puff about how women can do whatever men can do, but it just ain’t so. We’re built differently, and it doesn’t matter that one particular woman could best one particular man. The best woman is still no match for the best man, and most of the men she’d be fireman-carrying off the battlefield will be at least 100 lbs heavier than her with their gear on.

Women are often great shooters but can’t run in 50-80 lbs of gear as long, hard, or fast as men. Military training is hard enough on men’s bodies; it’s harder on women’s. And until women stop menstruating, there will always be an uphill battle for staying level and strong at all times. No one wants to talk about the fact that in the days before a woman’s cycle, she loses half her strength, to say nothing of the emotional ups and downs that affect judgment. And how would you like fighting through PMS symptoms while clearing a town or going through a firefight? Then there are the logistics of making all the accommodations for women in the field, from stopping the convoy to pee or because her cycle started to stripping down to get hosed off after having to go into combat with full MOP gear when there’s a biological threat.

This is to say nothing of unit cohesion, which is imperative and paramount, especially in the combat fields. When preparing for battle, the last thing on your mind should be sex; but you put men and women in close quarters together, and human nature is what it is (this is also why the repeal of DADT is so damaging). It doesn’t matter what the rules are. The Navy proved that when they started allowing women on ship. What happened? They were having sex and getting pregnant, ruining unit cohesion (not to mention derailing the operations because they’d have to change course to get them off ship.)

When I deployed, we’d hardly been in the country a few weeks before one of our females had to be sent home because she’d gotten pregnant (nice waste of training, not to mention taxpayer money that paid for it). That’s your military readiness? Our enemies are laughing – “Thanks for giving us another vulnerability, USA!”

Then there are relationships. Whether it’s a consensual relationship, unwanted advances, or sexual assault, they all destroy unit cohesion. No one is talking about the physical and emotional stuff that goes along with men and women together. A good relationship can foment jealousy and the perception of favoritism. A relationship goes sour, and suddenly one loses faith in the very person who may need to drag one off the field of battle. A sexual assault happens, and a woman not only loses faith in her fellows, but may fear them. A vindictive man paints a woman as easy, and she loses the respect of her peers. A vindictive woman wants to destroy a man’s career with a false accusation (yes, folks, this happens too); and it’s poison to the unit. All this happens before the fighting even begins.

Yet another little-discussed issue is that some female military members are leaving their kids behind to advance their careers by deploying. I know of one divorced Marine who left her two sons, one of them autistic, with their grandparents while she deployed. She was wounded on base (not on the front lines) and is a purple heart recipient. What if she’d been killed, leaving behind her special needs child? Glory was more important than motherhood. Another case in my own unit was a married female who became angry when they wouldn’t let both her and her husband deploy at the same time. Career advancement was the greater concern.

I understand the will to fight. I joined the Marines in the hopes of deploying because I believe that fighting jihadists is right. And I care about the women and children in Islamic countries where they are denied their rights, subjugated, mutilated, and murdered with impunity; and where children are molested and raped with impunity (not to mention defending our own freedom against these hate-filled terrorists who want to destroy freedom-loving countries like America.) Joining the Marines was one of the best things I’ve ever done in my life, and I’m glad I got to deploy. It not only allowed me to witness the war, but to witness the problems with women in combat.

Women have many wonderful strengths, and there is certainly a lot of work for women to do in the military. But all the problems that come with men and women working together are compounded in the war zone, destroying the cohesion necessary to fight bloody, hellish war. We are at war; and if we want to win, we have to separate the wheat from the chaff. And the top priority should be military readiness and WINNING wars, not political correctness and artificially imposed “equality” on the military.
coffee's for closers.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest