Background, FWIW: He works in the porn industry teaching newbies how to give blow jobs (and I'm guessing more). He has several girlfriends, plus fuck buddies.
first of all, this scumbag con artist is a PORN DIRECTOR. calling your employees "girlfriends" is like calling your boss, your jewish big brother.
btw, about his "girlfriend"...i would post her pic.. but it's hard to edit out all the sperm and black dicks covering her face since she's starring in about 8000 porn videos.
i'm pretty sure guys aren't looking to learn how to share their girlfriends/wives with 700 other dudes at the same time.
But his philosophy is interesting and compelling. He says all women are basically sluts by nature, and that it's pointless to "oppress" them because 1) they sleep around anyway and low-ball their count to pass themselves off as "good" girls, and 2) allowing them to open up and be sluts without stigma and scorn will [theoretically] make it easier for us to get with them, with the added side benefit of no longer having to waste a lot of time and money trying to date them.
his philosophy isn't interesting or compelling. it's EMASCULATED. like all "Seduction Community" retards, he's ADAPTING to the problem instead of fixing it.
women aren't sluts by nature and spreading that myth around only damages healthy relationship structures. women sleep around on emasculated guys like Johnny Soporno who DON'T know how to exercise authority over women, who DON'T know how to set boundaries in their relationships and who DON'T understand the damaging influence feminism wreaks on women's attitudes/behavior.
this is just as bad as assuming children will inevitably turn into criminals, so let's just build more prisons to prepare for the worst.
like women, the problem with children is not their inherent behavior flaws, but rather the parent's failure to exercise authority over their children's behavior.
Johnny's problem is the same problem most emasculated men experience; he naively assumes that simply telling a woman to respect him will automatically result in her giving him respect. he fails to realize that, just like children, women need BOUNDARIES, and those boundaries need to be ENFORCED. if you can't enforce your boundaries, dysfunctional (bad) behavior is given.
if you can't say NO to a child, you're fucked. your child will grow up to become a dysfunctional/criminal adult. this is why the majority of felons are raised by single mothers; women don't know how to enforce boundaries or say NO to their children.
similarly, if you can't say NO to a woman, you're also fucked. she will take advantage of you and undermine any possibility of a healthy relationship. this is why the majority of marriages today end up in divorce; men don't know how to properly exercise their authority over women to meet their relationship expectations.
He says dating and marriage are little more than glorified prostitution,
the institution of marriage has definitely been corrupted by feminism to the point where it's virtually useless to get married. the feminist legal system has repeatedly raped men in court. there is no benefit to a man getting married.
that being said, the concept of a romantic relationship is VERY HEALTHY. yes, feminism has polluted marriage, but that doesn't mean the underlying concept is flawed. like most emasculated males, Johnny is confusing the concept of marriage with the feminist application of marriage. in other words, just because the American school system is useless, doesn't mean the underlying concept of education is useless. it's crucial to understand the difference between concept and application. failure to make such an important distinction often leads to throwing out the baby with the bathwater just as many people today view relationships as pointless.
since you're basically paying women to be with you. And 9 times out of 10, they reject you after you've spent time and money on them anyway.
again, the problem here is not with the underlying relationship concept but with the emasculated male's dysfunctional application.
not even close. our ebook actually exposes his fraudulent teaching.He also says things that jive with your Principles.
(and we don't teach guys how to cover their girlfriend's face with the money shots of thousands of strange men).
He shuns PUAs.
he IS a PUA. his entire site is full of corny PUA bullshit. his sales tactics reek of PUA bullshit: "WIN THE LOTTO! MEET UNICORNS! OWN YOUR OWN TIME SHARE! WEEEEEEE!"
He says men have all they need to attract women, that they don't have to learn gimmicks, routines, etc.
does that include NOT BECOMING A FUCKING PORN DIRECTOR?
(Though he does "peacock" a-la Mystery with his Devil's horns, and he does use what could loosely be called a routine)
we don't teach guys to wear fucktard devil horns on their heads just to interact with other people.